Review
2.1/5
Ranked #20 overall
What it is
Range is a team coordination tool built around async check-ins, meetings, and mood sharing, with a lightweight goals feature attached. It is not structured around the OKR model.
Benchmark scores
Ease of use
3.5
Features
1.5
Task support
2.0
Integrations
2.0
Reporting
2.0
AI features
0.0
Pricing transparency
5.0
Strengths
- +Clean, modern interface — up there with the best-designed tools in this benchmark
- +Generous free tier for up to 12 users, with month-to-month billing on Pro
- +Built-in team rhythm — async check-ins, mood trends, meetings, kudos
- +75+ integrations that attach work items from other tools to check-ins
Weaknesses
- −Goals don't follow the OKR model — no key results, and no metric at goal creation
- −Metrics start at zero with no way to set a baseline, so "from 40 to 60" can't be expressed
- −Setting a metric happens through sharing a status update, which is counterintuitive
- −No progress chart on a goal and no comment threads on updates
- −No data connectors for goals and no AI features found in our session
Should you choose it?
Choose it if
You want a clean tool for async team check-ins, mood, and meetings, with lightweight goals attached — and you're not running a real OKR program.
Skip it if
You need actual OKRs — baselines, key results, progress charts, data connectors, or AI. Range's goal model can't express "from 40 to 60".
See how Range compares in the overall ranking or browse rankings by situation.